The way to floaters/foxes begins with "Blinking" English.

.

"Blinking" English

Mature adults should be aware of at least one time they used a tic or manipulation of their eyelids, neck or even elbow (Landis, 1939, see Davis 1984). These manipulations may have been employed for good or bad, as an attention getting device, or to take focus off one's immediate mind-set. (Omori 96, Stern 92, Vogel 89, Chollar 88). Examples range from police officers who caught speeders but didn't see that open beer can in the back seat. One twitches, squirms, or blinks (Hideki 98) to make discreet the objectionable beer can. Or when a mother-in-law's unexpected visit touched a sticky subject, you panicked, changed the subject or deviated in some way to keep the thing from entering your, and subsequently, her mind. Sense merely blinking can do this, and when people blink they usually miss floaters, blinking has not been solicited as it should.

People like quietness and verbal communication goes on without speaking. In medical studies 87% of all blinking is not associated with cleansing the eyes (20 to 30 times more p/minute-Stern). Before and after reading an article, when discreet, as a court witness, and when excited (from fears too...) people flutter more often. Proverbs states: "a violent man...blinks out schemes with his eyes, and pinching his lips together, he brings mischief to completion.1" A picture taken of someone with their eyes closed usually means she is blinking. Sleep is also a means of relating to the blink. What we want to see in the next few paragraphs is the relationship between blinking, cognizance, and light. Knowing why we blink when we don't have to will enable one to spot the floaters we may have been missing. The first, even smallest, relationship of visual light to the eye is a single photon. In complete darkness one can see only one photon (Motta 95). It fallows that one can see just one photon in their minds eye (compare Motta 95-Kosslyn/Miller95). Now when transferring words or inferences (Shelby, Wearne 99), startling another at close contact with unexpected facial gestures may cause the other to blink. The process can be reduced, something like Eye Blink Controlled Conditioning** (Lipp 94, Arlington 96), where any one of a million "standard" unexpected faces, combined with a blink, can cause another close by to blink. While doing this, one must make anywhere from the smallest impetus to an impact upon the other's conscious. As Dr. Motta says, "The retina is actually an outgrowth of the brain and processes some of the information it receives before passing the signal over the optic nerve to the visual center of the brain." This is, perhaps, why it makes sense that fears we reserve as unconscious brain activity will make us blink (more on this later) when recalled. So if one wants to make another blink, the teaser must elect to have at least one photon of light that will show that he is open or closed while blinking to make others blink. The teaser must also find an unexpected place, or an unusual method, to carry through the tease of making another blink. Weather a teaser does this or in regular conversation one startles another with a blink unconsciously or consciously. Like suddenly being closed to a person, Being cognizant of any sudden event naturally acts as a mental shock-boost depending upon the degree of startling. (Haerich, Paul 94) This seems to be what happens a great deal when blinking at another. Metal boosts in us or instilled in us from others, in blinks, are useful because we sometimes get dull and these "boosts" stimulate another's mental processes. (Hideke, Ohira Wardm, Winton, Makiko Oyama 98). "Kicking-of-the-tire," or imparting pressure by gestures (in conjunction with making an impact upon the other's conscious) one learns how one works the same as subatomic physicists hitting atoms to see how they work. So blinks, stimulate the conscious, and were we motivated in the first place or doing other mental functions we would not have to blink so much. God help our intuition!

Photons and the mind
During blinking periods; logically, one of three conditions must exist in the mind. No light at all, some light; or a field of light, i.e.; an illumination.* Use of the latter derivations can be seen at times when sitting across from another at a table. Blinking after an opinion that acted as a startle. For example, a controversial movie in one persons mind to another would make the original blinker cognizant of a) no light at all, b) one photon or a mix; the illumination* If b, but not a, were the case, one would have positive relating ability with respect to the opinion of the movie that was blinked out to the person across from them. Why photons in order to be positive? Light is still dominating in the blinker's mind because all positive nonverbal communication, (except intuitive communication where even blackness in ones mind can be positive inspiration, mystery, or transendentalism- Jung 71) needs a photon or more to emboss that which is related. Where their no light at all, (except in cases of intuitive communication, again) we conclude the blinking carried a negative such as deceptive, or repression etc.. This is because of not relating. Every person needs some sort of light to relate things to another. Weather it be grey, green or what have you, inspiration or mystery is positive without light. Another mind filled with backless is the complement of our light when communicating. This does not mean that light in the mind is how floaters always transfer themselves. We shall see light is the primal practical communicative thing, unless speaking of inspiration or other metaphysical. events. Now that one sees what is in the mind for communication, what is it's relationship to others?

Human energy that "bumps", involves a man in a restaurant trying, at-a-distance, to get a friends attention. The man or woman blinks profusely to get the opposite sex's attention. To understand how blinking can make people react at a distance, recall the last bad pun, or faux pax you did to a friend. You might have caught yourself blinking "out" importunities- apologizing to your companion to keep from offending your dear friend. If the man or woman in the restaurant, is of the same frame of mind, one may actually blink to get her/his attention. This kind of blinking must carry "in" it energy or prohibit human energy from any natural movement- another form of transference (Freud/Jung et. al.). If blinking can be a sign of being closed momentarily to another individual, when a person is closed, even without proof that human energy is literally in the air (what makes the floater photographable) no movement of energy can take place. Movement of huma energy is called the transference and is various in it's definitions but even in psychiatric settings a closed person cannot be transferred off of. Knowing now that blinking is directly associated with the act of, or lack of, psychological transference, we add to this the science of illusions. Blinking makes illusions of ideas and other metal activities appear to move out-ward. Fig. 5


Fig. 5 shows one way relatively large areas of "ideas" in one are presumably "moved" forward to another. As the light moves sequentially across the row, and skips a little space between two lights; 4 & 5, out-ward impressions like that of box 'X' move outward. Looking at the figure from left to right of the lights without changing speed of attention, the box "x" will appear to move outward. The idea makes communications of expressions and/or ideas possible also. One's personal sphere in conjunction with nonverbal communication can make ideas and expressions appear to move. One's sphere (i.e. space) and nonverbals act like the box, lights, and gap in between the lights. It is interesting to see how fast the illusion process can be done by just one blink and is broken down as follows.
1.)
Box 'X' is the area in our personal sphere where one puts the expressions or ideas to be projected. (Psychic energy or loving energy cal also be can be used in place of the letter 'X' or we can put ideas to represent words there). When ready, blinking or a host of nonverbal signs tell others we have something to be projected.
2.)
Next, further nonverbals convey we want to place words in various places around our 'X' area. These words or more expressions will act as the "light" and have enough energy to be vessels- just as the illustration uses light bulbs.
3.)
At the moment we sense the entire subjective action will reach our person(s), the small quantities of energy or word energy is ascribed in order across us with a small gap as we blink to act as our "box" area. Note: having ideas, expressions and the "Box" can rest within our personal sphere or can rest in our minds eye as well. A hesitation on the spot on our person, make energy similar to lights and gap when we leave out a word, hesitate, or change our blinking speed that "pushes" the illusion out. Often only one blink could do all of this. As we blink to do something besides cleans our eyes, one blink could move steadily up and down with a barely perceptible hesitation at just the point we have something to convey.

This slight hesitation in what another expects is all it takes to make things "project."

Illusions like this are a means often employed, that point is- ther are many things that blinking does (Other ways of directing communication out-word will come later) and loving energy is directed to others by halting the natural "flow" of nature or by illusions at times when we know people are most ready for it (Vanman, Dawson, Brennan 98).

Sadly in the case of some, the anomaly of getting another's attention by blinking may not be discovered unless revealed through experience. The Hietler-London exchange energy principal exonerated by Jahnn and Dunne is a foremost metaphor for the reasons some metaphysics has to be experienced and may not be learned from teaching; Eab =Ea+Eb=Ex.2. Eab being the "creation" of something new; Ea and Eb being the

* The illumination here happens during religious or enlightening states where one becomes thoroughly entrenched with a new revelation, or inspiration. Not being part of everyday experience the illumination is not important for this example.

** the Standard format for the presentation of stimuli in EBCC (Eye Blink controlled Conditioning) is called the delay paradigm. A neutral stimulus such as a tone or light is called the conditioned stimulus (CS). It is presented for durations of around half a second. While it is still on, the unconditioned stimulus (US) is presented, and the CS and US coterminate 50 to 100 msec later. In a laboratory for humans and rabbits, the US is a corneal airpuff. The organism learns to blink to the tone before the onset of the US. This is called a conditioned response (CR). The unconditioned response (UR) is the reflexive eyeblink to the corneal airpuff US. This measure serves as a control for the motor responding ability of the subject.

Page 1

On to page 3