the parent atoms (people) and Ex, the anomalous increment. Notice the absence of the anomalous increment; Ex, in the product? This is why when examining the "miracle" of blinking to get attention it no longer becomes a miracle.
Findings show consistent circumstances associated with excess blinking. Until an appropriate measuring device can obtain amounts of human (psychic) potential energy one at least sees communication during these times. With floaters it is possible to see how communication is achieved from person to person without seeing the persons or any nonverbal clues at all. It is done by recognizing changes in colors around us from another's presence. But first the basics of floaters of how to safely blink less .
If, instead of using a blink to convey ideas etc..., one could use a superimposition: a substitute reason (Sanmaier 88, Health Mag. 88) for what was done when one blinked. That is- communicating a little bit what one's blink did, and not blinking. One substitutes the blink for more open eye communication and gestures. Discretion, attention, emphasis, the beginning/end of a thing, all of which also help to get our minds going, are the basic reasons for excess blinking. The worst is deception, but more later. Before one can replace some blinking for absolutely no blinking and communicate with eye contact psychology, one must preform another step first. One still blinks in this step, but immediately uses eye contact abilities (eye contact psychology) for what the blink did. For example, instead of only blinking to another, one relates to another expressions, gestures, and one of the four basic reasons for excess blinking. That blink was for emphasis, that blink was for attention, or that blink was for discretion immediately after we blinked. We relate why we blinked after we blinked unnecessarily.To quietly communicate one of the basic reasons why we blinked. Of course, one lets eye cleansing blinking act as the involuntary impulse it is. On certain occations one will find their eyes burning while trying to keep them open, and this is natural-therefore* (i.e. see note at bottom for how to eventually deal with the burning), if the eyes are burning, by all means blink. But now all of our blinking communication has another form of communication with it. Except fearful blinking which will also be followed later. But professional and religious people have to learned to be sharp by taking steps to blink less. The best movie actresses and actors know the reasons why they blink and to add realism to their acting the lean more about blinking times. If one takes the time to study them closely they use many gestures. But for whatever reason; eye-contact psychology, common sense, catching foxes/floaters, most blinking is excessive with only five or six reasons for such.
.
After scrutinizing, writting down on a piece of papter why one blinked and has communicated a while the reasons to others, one is ready for communicating and NO blink at all. At times when one feels they want to blink one communicats- that eye-contact was for emphasis, that eye-contact was for attention, that eye-contact was for discretion and so on. One may feel they have to blink to get attention, and that is ok too so long as one makes some progress. Hopefully one will not need to blink for deception. Deception is good and bad as is a fish story, but not as self deception. But no one is trying to get rid of a little Bull S. Generally I trust most people are honest enough to know B.S. is ok. Eye-contact psychology, gutt-feelings or intuition, and a multitude of gestures may sound difficult, but one need only practice this Blinking exercise about 45 minutes every day. I like doing both a small part of each day. The last step just written conveys the idea, thought, or word one would blink to say and not blink it at all. This make take an act of will sometimes. Provided one sees what the other person understood them more or less, the "message" will have been delivered. The insight into the real world one can take as far as any mystic one has heard of, even prophets. The only repercussion is that one sould expect, better said: assert what others have on their minds when they didn't blink. This is an intuitive guess. It is not new because we do it all the time unconsciously. The lady, for example, in the grocery market merely speaks with her eyes "I am being discreet,""I am adding emphasis to that.""I need you to pay attention. Eye- contactpsychology is not new either. We do it all the time in more peaceful times. It seems at this time when many people are aware of how not to blink, the "bad guys," that is-those whithout honesty or a good conscience utterances and words seems to linger, according to Gaia, at the point where "good guys" stopping place is. Hence, one must constantly be aware that at many of these "resting places" the words of such wicked are, as wisdom says: "lying there." It is good to know that when practicing non-blinking abilities, the places where one rests, even to the extent of many trans of thought, have negatives that need dealing with.
*If reasons not to blink were published in 1987 with no opposition, doesn't it make sense to think about why others blink so much? Thinking about choosing between a good thing one surely will fair better. People learn by taking "businesslike" risks. To keep their eyes open when one could, could only be lead to less blinking. It would be no deception. So others not using Blinking psychology make it difficult for another that wants to improve- hence, the bruning from the eyes while trying not to blink others can be a deciet. This language sounds strong, no doubt, but one that whishes to excel, as most staright "A" students will tell you, will always laugh. But weather we use very little of Blinking English or use it every day for 45 minutes both blinking using superimpositions, with no blinks, using superimpositions, will develop more than sharpness and greater thinking necessity. After all only dull people always blink what they need to say. The end being Age to Youth Metamorphosis, healing, law enforcement from floater catching, and professional ability.
There is the more metaphysical methods emplyed that have proven to be quite easy to catch on with the general public. Not too much of the following has been proven, but it stands to reason that when one blinks one makes the world- "disappear." Making such happens enables one, at least in their unconscious or conscious mind, see just how much energy is supposed to come "up" from the ground viz: area under one's feet in every way, as well as how much of what is in front of one one is supposed to usurpt from their neighboring peers. In other words, when one blinks, most often than not, a certain amount of what is in front of them, or what is below them is supposed to be transferred into them. What can one do? As soon as one learns the true nature of FLOATERS, one can use floaters to gain attention to themselves just as the blink does, but WITHOUT making the "world go away." It then merely becomes a matter of substituting a floater for the attention one got from blinking, analize what energy needs drawing in the same way one's blink usually did. I've found with practice it doesn't take must of this method to keep from blinking. It is a matter of truly seeing that blinking communication is done mostly to draw in a certain amount of energy from one's peers (sometimes none, of course) and surroundings to themselves. Sense most people, if not all, seem to like this method more (2003) I am listing it hear. It would never-the-less be well to know why one blinks and other ways to keep the world from "not being their" as the greatest of mystics (even The Vedas, Orientals, Moses, Muhammud, Jesus the Anointed and others have seen). The "How to's" of blinking less first starts with a serious attitude. It is as only as difficult as juggling. With frustration at the beginning, but great satisfaction is realitzed when achieved. Second, one scrutinizes (i.e.- looks at for a period of time closely) for one full day, maybe two, how often one blinks when something more than cleansing the eyes. One uses a notebook pad, paper and a pencil, and makes a scratch for every blink that was not the automatic impulse it is. It is odd that people say blinking is something one must do and keep blinking themselves, when all doctors say blinking, like the heart mustles, is automatic and involuntary. To those that say this I say, keep alert to excess blinking and if your eyes really do need to blink they don't need any help from you. The frist step is not as hard as it sounds, and any burning of the eyes will become less after a week of insight. The fact is, we are acting according to Dr. Stern and others on blinking psychology. So make marks for one day frist (or two) and afterward one will be surprised at how mentally dull, afraid, or worst case, dishonest or deceptive they are. But DON'T PANIC! Watchman Nee, a psychologist of religion and many other psychologists and teachers know it is better to know yourself by acts of will or what Dr. Jung calls "dissimilation" than to not take risks and find your "shadow." With respect to honesty President Clinton did not get "hung" for a lie, but only benefitted in the long run. No doubt it was painfull, but one feels better not needing to repress their actions
Floaters/Foxes was written for the spiritually progressive and for the medical profession to represent my distaste for what cannot be proved empirically; done by a select few. As the Chinese saying is, "If what one does, one cannot make clear to others, it is not clear to themself." For the former to experience this event I suggest removing, for a time, all conscious or unconscious manipulations and signals of anxiety; twitching with the fingers, indications with the feet and a little unnecessary blinking. Half-hearted mannerisms will prevent detection of floaters. One shouldn't be distressed, again, at the frequency and maybe of theses blinks and quirks occurring, sense "blinking periods" change over the course of one to two days. To keep track of pertinent gestures, I suggest looking at Proverbs 6:14, in the Holy bible, Codex Leningrad B 19A By Kettle's edition of the biblica Hebraica (1951-55), as well as Blinking English. one must understand facts about unexpected phenomena in life. Things that intimidate like a sudden "Deathly Silence" in the air (Squitieri; USA TODAY, Arlington, Va.; Jan 8, 1999; pg. 17.A, Roxana Robinson; Wall Street Journal, New York, N.Y.; Oct 20, 2000; Eastern edition; pg. W.17, Holy Bible Job 34:29) and unexpected occasions elevating fear. Such as ananchorus scary nights. The advantage to keeping alert and fearless for floater catching is an overwhelming aid in many things other than catching floaters. That is, if floaters indeed are shown here to happen when another feels someone has differences with them, then according to a "Gaia" rule (that will be mentioned later) reversing differences between young and old bodies, (older differences according to Kline, Culler, and Sucec 1977, Axelrod and Cohen, 1961, Hooper, 1958, Danziger and Salthouse 1958, Crook et al., 1958, Botwinick, et al., 1959), making enough human (psychic energy) for self healing of large and samll visible things such as cancers, even proofs of religious miracles and bringing back extinct species can be accomlished. Unbelieveable...- well so were unfraudulant films of disappearing things in the latter 1900's. Best wishes to all endevors to do what only the doctors have said good!
In 1983, deciding to eliminate the mentioned manipulations... as janitor is a sewing business, fifty women and I experienced "highs" and a host of feelings we thought were religious. It happened one-day I was irritable with a couple of girls I assumed were rabbling at work time. It wasn't long before I signaled them, "please settle down." Not wanting; however, to blink at the instant I was conveying this and keeping things "discreet", I looked up to see two marble sized luminances dart out of me and into the girls. I could tell by gestures and looks on many faces that the others saw this too. Thus, fifty-one people witnessed the bazaar when most eyes are closed.
Floaters have been many things over the years
Some more outspoken photographers, expressed opinions, (Internet: AOL; Metaphysics Message Board 1998), and most everyone knows about these little lights that flicker when one moves a little, changes their focus, or is very alert. Changes coming so soon, as will be illicidated, have not enabled publishing of what is surely one unusual anomaly. But the easy conditions required to photograph the zooming "flashes" and "floaters," make questions of weather these lights, dots, existance unnecessary, hence they already exists and only need analyzing and clarifying. Small children have been a help in determining the identity of these things. Sense children are apt to talk about such icons, the significant lack of verbalization from children about floaters is evidence that they are seen mostly by adults. This does not mean that floaters can not proceed in or out of children. Cases where one unknowingly transfers from children will cause floaters, still, adults are different. Adults have lost the innocent, strictly- heart- motivation- features found in little children and favor the higher abilities of dominating nature. So adult negatives with high potential to affect people and focusing shows soveriengty is required for floaters.
Throughout history, analogies to negatives exists when the gods and others in ancients in Greek and Egyptian texts resolves problems causing earthquakes, erupting volcanoes, and chaos. People's "disturbances" to the very environment during conflicts is worthy of mort interest in clinical research. Floaters exist on flim when people do not agree with each other, exchange human energy,* or are disresrespectful. High speed filming shows floaters are made in any regular social exchanges. Interchanges with another at check outs, makeing regular exchanges in restaurants, and times of trust changes the atmosphere if indeed floaters going to and fro in between. The color of floaters is basically, red, black and white. Add this to the fact that children do not innitiate large negatives, yeald a candidate for the "foxes" in The Song of Solomon. "Do you people grab hold of the FOXES for us, the little foxes that are making spoil of the vineyards, as our vineyard are abloom?" The vineyard, or garden here representing a place of lovers, and the considerable disturbance correlates red, black and white "foxes" or red, black or white floaters. This union will be evident with the means to photograph floaters. Floaters also branch into two categories. The more mobile ones are rectangular to circular shapes and the spherical ones are stationary that last for approx. 1/10th sec.. Rectangular floater/foxes are most commonly reported as white red and black, while spherical shapes have by far diverse colors such as white, red, gold, black, violet, etc., and combinations. After spotting their first floaters, one's own imagination and various transferences can cause frustration creating an unending struggle to "catch" their characteristics. Hence- a "fox hunt."
*By use of floater detection, the complexities of the brain that are the usual excuse for such small scientific inventory can help in measuring libedo, or psychic energy but untill then one must use experiment and logical reason as this book will attempt.
Floater Theory.
The relationship of these to the brain and visual cortex will probably never be understood until science finally invents a machine that will measure potential human energy- psychic energy itself*. But the floaters that you and I will catch, if we have our eyes open, are innitially shown coupled with the ,the transference (of Freud), lack of knowledge, and a couple intimidating tricks by nature herself. However obscure these "flicks of light," are, they are symbolic of a transference (Freud, Jung). Transferences are conscious or unconscious acts of projecting one's problems with their answers on secure people and things. One's human (psychic)energy is "taken" or transfered from them when a person does this therefy relieving the transferer. Transferences leave one person feeling beter and another feeling less positive energy. Building upon the transference, a "disturbance" is created in the character or potential of those victimized by various transferences.2. These lucidities are not caused if one has knowledge of the transference happens beforehand. Nor are they seen very well if one is adpt to fears.
*I feel at this point I should mention is that one having had experience with these luminesces can simply imagine a floater within her consciousness sphere, that will be as light materialized from one's person, zinging around the room, into another, or back to one's own person. But one will understand this as we examine some physics, and the "ether" in which floaters travel.
Examined are some models where floaters occure due to not only science but very common experiences. If during any part of this reading one wishes to catch one, by all means do so. This paper will show how one can spot them, and that floaters/foxes* are traceable to opposition of one's state and/or direction.A simple example of floaters takes place when Man 'A' and 'B' are busy washing dishes. 'A' thinks the world should be divided into four acres for everyone: "a good solution for society..." 'B'has always believes the world will probably end by atomic war atomic war."...both Democrats and Republicans would agree with the latter. Because this difference can possibly happen or will wind up in a confrontation between the two, at the point 'A' was cognizant of his idea of the end of the world, if both men are open (Taking Care of Business, Dr.Frank Viscott) they will sense a fear or opposition. It is precisely during this point of potiential conflict, as opposed to true conflict, people feel a need to blink. Consequently they miss seeing a fox (transfernec of human energy) slip out from the least assuming character- possibly 'A,' and going into the greater probable future or more audatious character- 'B.' This happens quickly. Hence an anomaly is not investigated at the blink of an eye. If 'A' were not blinking and saw the floater/fox slipping out of himself, this would signal him of a transference. Also an impending struggle. The transference could be dealt with by 'A' 'pulling' his energy back into himself from 'B'.
Showing the following state/potiential changes, therefore, must include:
Of course, if one has already knowledge of pulling in a floater in from someone they suspect has transferred upon them, eventually they must also put something out. If one feels transferred upon, sees and pulls in a floater, they need put out the same amount of love, or nurturing as was presumed taken in from the floater. Putting out for taking in, as quantum complementary principal must be taken into account because floaters have proven to be a metric of emotions and cognition the same as Robert Jahnn and Brenda Dunne (Margins of Reality4) that support a geographic representation of thought.* One cannot "put" floaters back into a person because no one usually "disagrees" with accepting loving energy, hence this "agreement" disolves seeing floaters as loving energy going out. Floaters that one pulls in are necessarily a quantity of or all of some human energy transferred out, therefore acts of nurturing, encouragement, love etc. compensation for taking the floater/fox in.
"Better is a wise but needy child than an old but stupid king that hasn't got the sense to be warned any longer." Certainly this saying is not common to everyone, but something similar to it is when; "No one can teach him anything!" The latter is the same as the primer in the worldly sense. Literal warnings or cues, that indicate a need to watch out for broken glass, snow ahead, etc...are no less ordinary than other nonverbal cues and mentally discerned cues. The mind lets quirks and notions (mental cues) like this tell one that he or she needs to adjust their direction. If such fine mental rairities tell one to adjust their course, or "get on the ball," such perception's as; gut feelings, are another kind of warning, proven by (C.G. Jung), where the term warnings are a mere archaic term that doubles as scientific cues. Not that one hears voices or always has correct gut feelings (F. Viscott- 1989) but as another "religous logic" analygy, today's cue's protect the human species. Such are of inumerable, have been around sense history, and must be considered as a workable definition of "warnings" before realizing what floaters are made of. Cues and warnings, peculiar to one's mental perception includ, feelings, intuitions, are considered psychological as verbal (cues), non-verbal intuition or discern. Such can be warnings from without (as a result of the collective unconsciousness and consciousness) and from within, and sometimes both if one seems to have an idea that society or the work place have at the same time. It is important to note that all such tings reqire action or a "flight" from action. Accidents, violent crimes, and natural disasters, is a daily reminder of "the real world," and seems to bring on the things that are the real world, but some people that are determined to make more of themselves, change the if not just for stability, see in cues and warnings innnate processes to make constant practical and spirual progress. The question becomes- are efforts to unite this world of impossibilities to the soul/spirit just philosophical, or is there a link from our horrid "real world" to what as some call Paradise quests? Sometimes reality is totally dependant upon the observer. One's own energy from floaters in a dark room confirms this. All people will be able to live in a regular peaceful world because of two very distinct common features, or common sense. Even if all were able to change their world from one mass to another because of law enforcement from metaphysical acts that speeking as a "wizard," for lack of better words no one metaphysically inclined wants to engage his fellow in a "wizard war." It is easier to talk it out. Finally the most logical of all persons told me, an atheist, "One must influence his neighbor to their own way of thinking TO THE MORAL LIMIT." Each person should not do things harder than anyone can do easily themselves or understand.
To start with our explainations then. Let us start with the visible evidence of pictures of floaters and work backward to the experience Floater/Foxes; the visible connection between mankind with nature.