One lifts the plane up about 70 degrees; X to X' (rotate plane on horizontal axis). Then turn the circle (on vertical axis) toward the reader. As donut and all is moved none of the initial elements of the analogy have changed. There is the same situation, but from an entirely new angle. Add a plane -X- and "hotdog" slits; A' to B', for a light to travel threw and one gets a background that is magically the same as the Young Light Diffraction.: Fig. 2.

If one is unfamiliar with Young Light Diffraction; Light; when passed through a single slit and then a double slit plane- plane 'X', one gets something unexpected. As particles, light would show only two images on the background that would be the shadows of A' and B.' This is also what logic says would happen if light were consistent. But as seen, there are stripes; a diffused pattern, and wave constants. These waves are like water waves through a jetty when they are dispersed and are called Interference Patterns4Interference is another statistic; an indecipherable organization. So, combining this; light, which can act as an inspired idea for leadership, coming to both A and B at the same time, one creates a symbolic representation of an indecipherable organization. This confusion can be as two people getting an idea at work at the same time and both getting the promotion for it without fighting. So one of them must play humble and let the other "lead" with the idea (This will never happen in New York City or Chicago, but science must believes in ANY possibility). What is actually higher in terms of science can be identified if we can make what is symbolically higher, the one that will actully get to use the idea (A or B) into what is symbolically lower- the one that gets the idea but cannot be the leader. Lower is also humbler. First we must set up the symbols for lower, higher, and what can only be described as a human ability.

Of course it is possible to have two people get the same idea for leadership without confusion but only one person can be the leader or two people lead equally at all times- that just don't work.

'A' decides to lead. 'B' is not out, so he must be humbled. B is humbled by double splitting one of the white stripes already double split; Fig.; 3

Fig.;3

Humbling, due to more work. Also, because humbling means making lower [to the ground] and is a human concept that is one of the few words containing both states of high and low. Humble is high as a virtue, and low by it's nature. If one keeps double slitting the results of what was double slit, the light will become an example of our original light idea given in the beginning. Let us look at this and see. Double slitting the results of the first slitting: A' and B' gives A'' and B''. This is directed work. Again, one double slits the result of that: A'' and B'', for A''' and B'''(Fig. 3A).

Fig.3A

. Humbling, or any word that carries the same duo meaning, such as polar opposite words, is finally graphed as all of our goals were met by doing directed work as well as keeping the original symbols. Looking at the scene from many points of views will still sustain the original peace,

Fig4.

or God-symbol, while the confusion of the Young Pattern is conformed into a uniform light- a symbol of good. The extra planes for slitting symbolized directed work. Any time a pattern as complicated as this becomes resolved it becomes an example of entropy reversing (Entropy is when organization or power becomes more unorganized, the reverse is when unorganized becomes organized by extraordinary means, that is not fully preformed except by human capability) The confusion, Young Light Pattern symbol, is transformed to the consistent and useful light in Plane 7.. Reversing entropy, or statistical reversal is represented when B does what any person can do when he double slits the symbol of himself- self-humbling- by a "diffraction" of his own being, being what B double slits again. A person extraordinarily changes an idea of himself from one state to another keeping the representation of the higher to lower person- 'B'- in within symbolic tactility.

(continued)

Although sounding complicated, looking at things from many angles is what abstract science does. The fainter, and consistent light that resulted from a humbling is a useful continuum. It is as practical an inspiration as our light at the beginning. Further scrutiny of our analogy says this light in plane '1' and plane '7' may be "bad" inspiration. Hitler, Genghis Con, and others, combined with their certainly humble followers, showed anyone can lead no matter how bad the idea and have humble followers making good something as bad as Hitler's philosophy and Genghis Con's murading. Now that we have seen higher from lower what is high is the altruistic sense? So what is generally meant by the term "good human?" The term good in a child's life is not going to harm them. If a child wants to do good but does not, the child is not usually daunted by the failure. But because adults have the ability to think much higher than achieving, there is a probability that their mental concepts of perfection could inflict damage to them. For example; if someone wants to quite smoking, they can deviate from their original idea, rationalize away the initial frame of mind... and live in self denial. Such self denial is disapproved in any psychological circle. But weather they could or could not quit, they suffer a period because the original frame of mind came to bare (i.e.; came to mind) combined with rationalizing away the inability. This rubbing-the-grain in their mentality holds true for absolutely any idea of self improvement coming forward with the failure rationalized. Furthermore, the human brain logs and files things that we hold as good. Unless what was bad becomes good (because of changing circumstances) one is bound by that conception. Sense it is clear that rationalizing coming to bear with the original idea is unhealthy, why can't one dominate another piece of nature (the original idea), make it bad, and be free to progress their own way? Because logic coming to bear with good determines ones inability, then one can submit, improvement is determined by yet another paradigm. As this idea has sovereign qualities, has all major virtues found in nature, and distinguishes good, here is something that will "prove to be." There is much to be found of the Physics of God- or an Alpha and Omega Point in Physics Of The Resurrection for a God outside as well as our being "god"... but Douglas Adams sums it up nicely when saying,; "What's the use of us (philosophers, and mystics) sitting up half the night arguing that there may or may not be a God if you (scientists) get his bleeding phone number the next morning?"5. Good can reach unimaginable composition and the light in our last plane can be used because it was changed only from what was is in the 21st century as extraordinary means. Our utopia has higher, lower, and unimaginably good as opposed to bad ideas for one's future earth. The five acres for everyone depicted here need not be the future, of course, but it will enable one to place a logical future "utophia" in the foreground, bad in the background, and all of the other philosophical ideas sandwished in between for the ether. If indeed the Gaia Theory replaces survival of the fittest, then the above sandwish of philosophies will make possible peacable human relationships. Now all our ether needs is it's efficacy outside of mankind. Nature, and the elements.

This characteristic of the ether would have to prove inside and outside nature, as well as in mankind. Able to be not only a medium for light that we seen in the air around us, but also prove good (i.e.;in favor of mankind and nature) and easy to understand. The following illustration shows these characteristics as a tacit "teem-spirit," "peace" and "we-feeling" (Cartwright, Row, Peterson) that is anthrapomorphically in everything. As the ether, and later it will be shown the air itself (when ever I say "air" I will be referring to any atmosphere one finds them self in), varying in "we-feeling", has life-like qualities thus making everything else seem as if it were nurturing- nice trees, lakes or material things that make us feel good to think about them.

The following illustration shows these characteristics as a tacit team-spirit, peace, and we-feeling that is anthropomorphically in everything. As the aether, and later it will be shown the air itself (whenever I say air I will be referring to any atmosphere you may find yourself in), varying in we-feeling, has life-like qualities thus making everything else also life-like. First we will examine how team-spirit is made and dispersed in a simple and procedural way. One can make a substance that will be that phenomenal we-feeling that until this time (and to my knowledge), was only a fleeting feeling in the work place. Fifty people are in a work place. One of them feels badly. Very typically another would like to make them feel better. Hoping to cheer the jeremiad, a person proceeds, first, to think about pleasant things around them, in them, or anything to accumulate psychic energy inside themselves. These good feelings, as a quantity, they hope to direct to the one feeling badly. The same as you empower love to a sick hospital patient needing comfort, you transfer loving energy to another in a relatively small work environment. As feelings are directed to a patient in a hospital visit, you should not always speak, but let your feelings be directed to the jeremiad. The only difference being an increase in distance from the target person – patient to yourself. If you can do this - accumulate loving psychic energy, transfer it to those needing love but not complaining, and be discreet e.g so that the pride of the one(s) needing psychic energy is not diminished, a phenomenal peace will often cover the work area and actually be felt. This is because the target person(s) is/are restored to a oneness with the group while preserving the sufferer’s self-respect. The restoration of the non-complaining jeremiad must also be when everyone is rather busy and reserved - that is to say - not too egotistically inclined. Feelings become untrustworthy when too much commotion is in the air. This we-feeling teamwork is also good, because it adds a serene element to the work force. The reverse procedure shows why such a peace can be experienced. In Fig. 5.

Back to page 4

On to page 6