1.) One or more of the individuals in the dull room transformed to more lively, and a "oneness" was present. That is- everyone now senses greater focus, and presence around them. More understanding, more love, and any other words meaning the same things seemed to take up the space, the air, the physical time and distance between people. Others just coming into the room, not feeling the same we-feeling are encouraged or strengthened as if the room were filled with such charge.

A noticeable change in strictly the atmosphere of the room, would make a theoretical measuring device for psychic (human) energy rise but for the time being science can and will have indirect proof of this.

Psychology says that in order to have a symbol, a subject must see or sense something real, an object, that triggers the symbol somehow. Now, pictures of floaters were not just medical problems with the eye, but symbols, traces of energy outside flowing from one person to another. Large and vivid floaters can be made with rise and fall psychic energy values, but small and very fast floaters seen only with special equipment can be seen with what is apparently no rise and fall human energy values at all. Persons losing the energy, I will call the "objects" of the symbols. As symbols little lights can be pulled out without seeing the object (people) but what about cases where the mind creates these floaters as symbols without objects from any know source? Visible symbols can indeed be materialized without an outside object (not only by one's mind) but from conditions that are not real. If symbols were made for people and these symbols were not the intention of the people but the intention of the air. This will be a break threw if these same floaters, that behaved exactly as symbols, were constructed from one and the particular floaters were constructed by air itself- living air creating (floaters)- would be a way to put it . How can science prove no outside source created symbols? By pictures of floaters made from simply a whim, an accedental floater that happens when a person wrongly imagines energy is transferred from them. If one assumes another person is impinging on them, a floater often comes out of that person and behaves exactly as if the transfer were real. Hence the person(s) are fooled by the air. I do not have the high speed, low light photography (approx. 150 fps., 3200 ASA/ASI) needed for this proof but hope to get it shortly to preform the experiment. But all that is needed is a test subject that thinks something was impinged (by an unseen controller letting such an idea pass threw his mind), which will subsequently come into the mind of the test subject thereby causing a floater to come out of the object (the test subject). The example of one blinking and squirming to keep the beer can in his car from entering his mind and subsequently arousing the police officer is the same thing, only the controller will alow an idea of a trasfer of psysic energy from the object (test subject) enter his mind. The controller will thus have created a false condition of a transfer but the subject will imagine (consciously or unconsciously) that someone is going to impinge energy upon him-a transfer, and therewith energy will come out of the latter proving the air can fool one that thinks he/she knows floaters. The controller will have to try hard not to let the idea of transfering enery enter her mind as much as possible before the experiment so that the subject will not "feel" an impending transfer of energy from him. Some notion that a transfer of energy from "leakage" will result, no doubt from inablitily to keep one's mind in perfect discretion. Never the less, this "leakage" can be compensated for by the controller thinking very hard and long about pulling (i.e. a transer of energy) from the host when the experiment proceeds. If the controller makes such a idea strong enough, however, the object will consciously or unconsciously sense someone may be transferring off them and photos will show a floater going out of the host to the controller precisely as the thought happen. Here one sees no visible object (no real transferrence was going to take place) for a floater (the symbol), so then the air must have some ability within itself to fool those over it- mankind. Now, given nature's ability to fool mankind is in the latter experiment the following will show the air itself sometimes has anthropomorphic characteristics. This time one films a floater that can be made with no subject or host making a floater. In this case the following mistake in judgment must be set up. A mistake on behalf of one thinking another is going to transfer off them, as the presumption in the first experiment, but although human's repeat the same conditions, no floater is made by the air at all. What should make a floater that fools the man, this time, is utimately not photographable by any means. Floaters can be filmed by one circumstance, and all of the variables (except the air) will and will not get a floater of a person responsible for a presumption. This can be examined in another example if one, say, is over assertive with their girl-friend and thinks he is a Casanova and deserves a little kiss. The rock and roll, cocky male then reaches over to his girl for a kiss, but merely gets slapped, sense she was in truth, not ready for a kiss. According to prior experiments, a floater should have come out of the male the instant he was cognizant of getting a kiss. Yet, sometimes during these instances, their will be no floater no matter how fast and detailed the photo equipment is. If this experiment were duplicated in what science calls a "controlled" setting, (as in the format for high speed photographing of floaters), sometimes one gets a floater with all of the controls, and sometimes not. But always with a sufficient rise and fall of human energy a floater will be photographable. Changes in the energy level of the air (more or less "we-feeling" from the air itself. If the air therefore, can effect rise and falls making a floater the visibilily of psychic energy or not show psychic energy rises and falls making somehow have a "soul." As part of Gaia Theory's ideal purpose to look out for itself in highly complex axioms, A-life properties must also be inherent in things...at least some times. So then, not only does mankind give things favor and nurturing, but nature herself exercises love to mankind from stored energy.

(Floaters, of course, can be manufactured from one's own person and not need another. An experienced person can simply imagine a floater within herself and maneuver it into her consciousness sphere. The light will move around the room, into another, or back to the one making it, but several things must have happen form the latter experiment. The symbol is a sovereign entity, the air is a sovereign entity, or both at certain times.) Now one sees the importance of ether in the literal air and that human beings are sometimes equal to, or above everything in nature. Sense the human race can understand it's own self, change nature, and reverse the laws of entropy people are not subjugated to anything, including anything many times.

This leads us to the last reason people blink, experiences that can only be called chaos.

The Last Reason for Blinking

Persons knowing about floaters and keeping their opinions from being severely attacked by floater manipulation as well as anyone else keeping theirs by the same means forces one to separate the good vibes of those agreeing with you (i.e. a person or group's personal space with their emotions) from that of another person's (or group)- that are not in harmony with your opinion. Those for your notions into one group and those seeming to be against what was conveyed (or those without an opinion) into another group. Now. Remember our happy room compared to a dull room? If one wants to keep their eyes open for floaters and calm this volatile atmosphere; one imparts energy, or love* to the group that truly seems for you. Increasing the loving energy of one's constituents provides stability, even though someone else is using floaters against you. Even if one has to go out to look for others that seem to agree with your opion the effort is satisfying. Others will have to do the same for their opinions. The idea is to get used to, not give in or retaliate, and learn not to blink when feelings of one or more seem contrary. It may sound difficult, but, if one can convey energy to only a few people that seemed to agree with her, she will compensate for any chaos and keep the floater symbols for one's own opnion in check. Dividing groups like this will reside into somewhat peacefulness again after only a few minutes. The other possibility, letting floaters that represent one's own energy float out of one will only mean difficulty later on or even a stumble (sin- layman's terms) or an apathetic giving up. Calming differences immediately with way is as nipping things in the bud. To have some opinions for oneself will mean, in time, self respect and greater work output.

Ability to survive a "volatile environment" is valuable when practicing Age to Youth Metamorphosis, as well as enforcing one's own "laws" and perhaps new ideas without physical fighting, misunderstandings, or effort later on due to transfers, moral stumbling or errors.

If people everywhere did what was mentioned above, wouldn't a chaotic state make confusion everywhere? If everyone was allowed their opinion no one could keep up with such diversity. This I believe to be false. It is as saying life and the human mind are limited. No doubt at some point in science I believe they are, but not in no way practically defined at this time, so I point again to the Gaia Theory. Part of the Gaia Theory states that ultimately, the earth looks after itself. Others opinions would taper from defusion to a workable Esilum where. Even if humans could change mass according to protocol outlined in Age to Youth, changes would be limited by Gaia Theory principals.** Keeping one's eyes open when others intimidate make one want to be "closed." The ensuing volatile environment is very important but relatively new. I detail the use of the Gaia theory and a volatile environment again in Floaters and Age to Youth Metamorphosis.

"If floaters are seen and felt at all times why would they suddenly appear in the latter 1900's?" I believe I can show two reasons why floaters were not published until this time. However more knowledge of today's post-modernism as well what "air" is scientifically, and philosophically.

Floaters, Nature and Max Plank

First, common feelings of a permeating we-feeling .

*Loving and nurturing one outside of oneself is as the suffering jeremiad example and can obviously saturate the one getting such love. But the space, that comprises the area around a person, that is, the area from the person to a distance outside the body may or may not be something one can feel intuitively. The we-feeling is as if in the litter air composed of time and distance in between people could also be expressed in humanistic terms like "mercy," and "respect." "Mercy," as a mental measurement (Jahnn, Dunne), is equivalent to the saying "give me time," Additionally, when one says "respect is here" may accurately separate people psychologically. In cases where one seems too close, when one's familiarity with another feels too much affectionate intimacy one convey's "there is room (distance)". Having listened to many candid opinions with others, persons of the same sex (or even those of opposite sex) cuing the world "respect" always seems to void any inordinate sexual feelings between them. Finally, you are "solid" or that is "solid" can be a metaphors for "mass (solid things)" and so on. Applicable to whatever else is literally between people, the brain makes verbal measurements that fit the four basic laws of physics, time, distance, charge, and mass (solid things). Scientists are always trying to put things into a box. Freud was a scientist. In spite of debate of his theories in the 1800's, Freud said a person's feelings, all emotions, could be quantified- made a quantity. In keeping with this tradition I would like to limit even symbols, spirits, and other things into quantities.

Confirmed by rituals like shaking hands, hugging, kissing cheeks, even a cough as a signal that attracts attention is finite. If these things are limited as a quantity then symbols can be measured. Sandwiching one emotion between two emotions Before and after giving a cashier money, one may sense; 1.) excesses or lack of affection. 2.) possible resentments or understanding, or 3.) indifference or feelings of commonality. Close scrutiny before a short exchange with another, over time, with show feelings to be discernable. More emotions may be discovered if during exchanges with others a person can keep their eyes open. "The mobilizing" and "disposing" of human energy (Jung)was published around 1920 and long last this philosophy is being accepted even by religious collages. An educated person cannot help but pick up on the idea emotions are regulated by, "thought spread over positive and negative traces [and memory traces] of ideas."¹. Science, henceforth, should be more at ease with fundamental religious principals (J. Hommer 94, W.W. Gibbs 79, A. Goldfineger 98). Keeping emotional quantities in mind, remember hot high school days? Losing your bright, busy-tailed, morning start you may have noticed you started to nod on the desk, but as you did, did you remember something else happening? As you slipped away, the lights appeared 'dimmer.' Of course, the lights did not actually dim, but if you lost hold of what was on your mind, alert concentration, the shadow may have been a dissipation of mental charges making what appeared to be a darker surrounding- less knowledge in one form or another (Augustine talks about spirits as God being metaphysical light i.e. real, but around physics). We snapped back upon recognizing this warning cue but sometimes found we were nodding again. Lights seemed to get dimmer as we would give in to the fatigue and our learning alertness dissipated into wherever it went in the room. Neither tiredness not the physiology of sleep is examined here, but one of many continuum between science and symbols- the darkness that seemed to be around one. Just how real are these changes of colors around us. Johannes Itten (The Art of Color) suggests; "Colors should be experienced and understood, not only visually, but also psychologically and symbolically," "The artists in stained glass used color to create a supramundane, mystical atmosphere to transport the meditation of the worshiper to a spiritual plane." An interplay of things between us and the environment is a peculiar part of nature that extends from a person into his or her environment. A "spacial floater" that is very broad in scope, one that covered everything within one's vision, would be this interplay of us, light, and symbols much larger than the marble sized floaters. While walking during a nice afternoon, at vacations, in the nodding example, and when feeling 'on top of the world' things, actually subatomic particles and energy, epistelogically influence the air. Our world becomes brighter with a glow about it that was not always present at other time. . It is as if it were sometimes one's own personal perspective of things. Now if artists say "Colors are forces, radiant energies that affect us positively or negatively, whether we are aware of it or not."³ Let us change the classroom example into a suburb in Miami. In this suburb it is Friday night and you run out of gas two miles from home. As you try to deal with this event you realize somehow you are also in the wrong neighborhood. In other words, your disposition is even dimmer because are lost. The area around you dims also, perhaps, as the unfamiliar is not the clear night it was when you used to be safe in a protective car. So far so good for a nice thing to think about... Add to this the unfathomable. A group of young males are huddled by parked cars, drinking beer, and you must pass them to get home. Any other time seeing the glint of illegal beer bottles in the youth's hands would not be as ominous. Indeed in truly frightening situations, not so much as cozy lab psychology settings...things take on profound color change. The 'ol gothic "Halloweenish" effect or a red Floater look ensues. If one's eyes are open before the bad scenario with the beer cans et. al..., no doubt one could see an excess 'red' that comes from God knows where (It probably results from every angle around one and is laden with danger). Being lost, no gas, lose boys and beer bottles enhance orange, or reddish symbols. Of course, one's symbols, as such may not be red or orangish as this case, but regardless, symbols are inescapable during these times. A lower state of attention, and an apparent lack of orientation, biochemically, made things only appear to be colored differently. But those dealing with dangers in there work, know that "normal" can leap to even ghostly whitish hues and speak warnings and caution. So colors in the air as an denote warnings in symbols and relate themselves to us when weather we try to manipulate (by blinking etc.) them out of our conscious mind or not. Even symbols that are spontaneous; "...the best possible description or formulation of a relatively unknown fact (Whatever you are supposed to look out for, be warned of, or realize), which is none the less know to exist or is postulated as existing" (Jung) are quantities. Eyes open we would see the color's change as the presupposition, symbols, changed.

One the one side, we know that negative symbols as well as positive ones are not necessarily real, but like scare crown that holler, among other things: "Look out!" etc. And sense warnings symbols such as the "gloomy" night are not going to harm us unless we not head them, experiencing new symbols can be objective and need not be intimidating. Detached observation leads to the manipulation of and experiencing of floaters.

Not that mankind cannot override nature to dominate it to it's worse. One's sees this simply in cases where oil spills, if unchecked could destroy vast areas etc....

Loaded with these ideas, let us look at black body radiation. While cooking a batch of "nothing," Max Plank turned what was a black void inside a box to red, then orange, and blue etc. up the color spectrum to white. The colors did not gradually move up the scale, but went there in little bursts or "packets." Quantum Physics started as a study of short quantities of "reality" that comes in little packets. The first packet that was in the box was a dark box that eventually changed. As stated, the basic state, the rest state of human energy in any group, can be called peace or we-feeling. The quantities of peace resulting from that protocol can be a starting place, just as Max Planks starting place was the 'nothing' in a black box. As peace and any mood increases in density it would theoretically become visible. ANY substance increasing density will follow this rule. If the space in one's perception, starting as clear or "nothing," could condense from the rest state: peace, and double back upon itself, it would transform peace to something else, and in principal become visible. Colors of things like emotion around us, as they increased density, could become visible. Of course, today an uninvestigated process of confining human energy to boundaries to overlap psychic energy is yet to be published. But if reality is sometimes due to our interaction with the things around us, then human energy folding in on itself would happen. This is due to the limit of perception, i.e. people can perceive only as far as they can see. An accumulation of emotion could indeed overlap.

Now is a very difficult part of this essay; why floaters were not an imposing effect until the latter part of this century. Until recently, religion was not favorable to many psychological advancements. "We don't want to hear any that "'psychologeh'" round heah!" Was a common stay from many protestant factions. History shows science did not sound like religious sayings, The Tao of Physics, science of religion (Raymo 94) etc. have now made reputable facts, even on sides, compatible. Physics, and religious gatherings will inevitably have another one saying; "Physics," (or "Religion,") says that too!" If religion is accepting more psychology (i.e. science) and Quantum Physics, visa-versa, then why hasn't public management acknowledged this? Apart from media fanfare, the reason is change has been hindered. Neither a change for the former Soviet Union or management can happen fast simply because of "ghosts." Like an old barbed wire fence separating people taken down will still stop people and make them look for prickles, old ghosts holler, "scientists are vainglorious," and, "religion is an escape." Religious people daring to read simple business psychology are intimidated, and vindication by science on religious dogma has been cause de celebrate. Spirits of things work without discrimination. The world needed religious, political and business organization, but stigmas from thousands of years of 'not knowing' caused an "unconscious substitute" (Jung) for what was truly effectual. The ability to "bust" ghosts, so to speak, to their constituent divisions on the human psyche (a process that requires fearless manipulation of psychic energy that will be explained in Floaters and Age to Youth) never seems to have been possible. These "spirits" made ideas of change all the harder. Grabbing what looks good, although not wrong in itself is only temporal and rifts between fundamental religion and intellectualism became the rule. Finally, earth threatening pollution, and worldwide unrest⁴ is making mankind see a need of balance; and harmony in social forces; communications, aesthetics, government, religion and science. Political might, authority from science and even religious domination of the less educated was in danger from an unexpected direction. With attention on probable earth annialation society had to slow down. But today, knowledge from TV., computers, and motion pictures, The information Explosion is gargantuan. Education weather from Gaia Theory, the earth looking after itself, or Devine providence authority has now taken interest, and sees a need for "no way back"-nonfatal progress. Unless an unforseen change occurs a gargantuan sprit of knowledge empowering the masses will naturally "bust" the ghosts of unfruitful direction. Not to say that a hostile scenario of "too many (educated) chiefs could not ruin the earth soup," but I personally am convinced answers will come to solve those problems too. A second question arises which is how to keep people together, but if science shows consistency in religion, one can allude to the doctrine of merely "meeting with other believers" if only to see we look normal to others. The other hindrance to change was in the history of mass media. Mass media's ability to solve problems became one's hope for solving problems. Solutions became it's responsibility because of things like swaying the Vietnam war, making President Kennedy look good etc.. TV and mass media showed their power had almost no limit. However, it would only seem just that the barrage of boasting from networks about it's power- namely the influence on people, and other showings (Los Angles times 1996) would cause an eventual fall. The lack of follow-up on Tenneman Squares' banned demonstrations for democracy, made one wonder just what did TV media stand for. It seemed the media was either afraid of stirring up the Chinese with confrontational headlines, or it was unaware of it's own lack of interest. The coo de ta for mass media supremacy came with complaints of flaunting the Gulf Wars' violence and what the news really was was being devalued by rival news agencies.

Without the dominating educated class, and mass communications influence, floaters have more "room" in the literal air. When possibilities are limited for the world course the number of different objects, solutions in the literal air [or worlds] or in any system causes the remaining objects become more distinguishable- even if such objects are stigmas in the air. Physics calls this the law for density. Setbacks for floater recognition also existed, but in the early 80's an optimum environment for floaters- the ability to disagree without fear of hostility as opposed to 90's gun violence opened up greater disagreeing potential.